Neil deGrasse Tyson on the Hidden Costs of a Cosmic Perspective

In Astrophysics for People in a Hurry, Neil deGrasse Tyson explains nothing less than the workings of the entire cosmos. But in the conclusion he raises a more demanding problem: where, in all these astral wonders, do we humans fit in?

Wikipedia

       The cosmic view comes with a hidden cost. When I travel thousands of miles to spend a few moments in the fast-moving shadow during a total solar eclipse, sometimes I lose sight of Earth.

       When I pause and reflect on our expanding universe, with its galaxies hurtling away from one another, embedded within the ever stretching, four-dimensional fabric of space and time, sometimes I forget that uncounted people walk this earth without food or shelter….

       When I track the orbits of asteroids, comets, and planets… sometimes I forget that too many people act in wanton disregard for the delicate interplay of Earth’s atmosphere, oceans and land.…

       I occasionally forget those things because, however big the world is…the universe is even bigger.

     …[So I] think of people not as the masters of space and time but as participants in a great cosmic chain of being, with a direct genetic link across species both living and extinct, extending back nearly four billion years to the earliest single-celled organisms on Earth….If a huge genetic gap separated us from our closest relatives in the animal kingdom, we could justifiably celebrate our brilliance. We might be entitled to walk around thinking we are distant and distinct from our fellow creatures. But no such gap exists. Instead we are one with the rest of nature, fitting neither above nor below, but within.

     [The cosmic perspective is] more than about what you know. It’s also about having the wisdom and insight to apply that knowledge to assessing our place in the universe.

     The cosmic perspective is humble….

     [It is] spiritual–even redemptive–but not religious….

     [It] enables us to grasp, in the same thought, the large and the small….

     [It] opens our eyes to the universe, not as a benevolent cradle designed to nurture life but as a cold, lonely, hazardous place, forcing us to reassess the value of all humans to one another….

     [It] not only embraces our genetic kinship with all life on Earth but also values our chemical kinship with any yet-to-be discovered life in the universe, as well as our atomic kinship with the universe itself.

The last seven excerpts here are especially bracing. They assume a widespread acceptance of basic science. They leave no room for truisms about being mere specks in a vast unknown where mysteries await. Tyson knows a good deal about that “vast unknown” and it’s not a welcoming place; we humans are genetically not so exceptional even on our own planet; and grasping “the large and small” in the same thought as we humbly assess our place in the universe is not a routine intellectual skill for most of us.

Still, it is so valuable to have Tyson’s map of the challenges.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

One thought on “Neil deGrasse Tyson on the Hidden Costs of a Cosmic Perspective

  1. Tut tut tut! I’ve finished with Quantum and finished with The Big Bang (and looking to convert!)… we live in an Oscillating Universe, eternally expanding and contracting over a period of a trillion years or so… from 9 billion light years to 200 billion light years, and back in ‘contraction’ phase. The Universe is expanding in all places at once, as energy is converted into matter from various hydrino and fusion reactors throughout the Cosmos…
    Dark matter is a lower form of hydrogen, (hydrino)… the most ubiquitous element in the Universe… hydrogen can form into 137 lower forms.
    I believe 20th century Quantum Mechanics will go down in history as the ‘Dark ages’ of physics… when physicists essentially gave up and interpreted the science from already formed mathematical equations (instead of deriving the mathematical equations from the observational science)… … and people will look back and see this mistake could be all be traced back to a schizophrenic 18th century philosopher named Immanuel Kant!

    Like

Comments? Questions? Reactions?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s